Talk:Anonymous-Asshattery Paradigm

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

From Pee Review[edit]

Humour: 6 What you say is funny enough, but I believe that if you expanded on the sections, particularly the five levels of anonimity, you could have a decent-length artical with good content. The bit about Napoleon is wierd, though.
Concept: 9 You speak the truth, indeed.
Prose and formatting: 6 Use subgroups; it will make everything much neater, especially the short sections.
Images: 8 Appropriate images all-around.
Miscellaneous: 8 Teeters on random, but stays sort of sane. I like it.
Final Score: 37 You have the beginnings of a good article here. Fix up the formatting a bit and expand on what you have; no need to use new topics entirely. Also, if you really want to keep the bit on Napoleon, try to make it fit a mite better.
Reviewer: Judgement 06:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)