Talk:Discovery Channel
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
You forgot the animal sex. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're right, dammit. I should be ashamed to call myself a Welshman. Rabbi Techno
kvetch 
Contribs 
FOXES 11:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I still think it's great. Additionally, with "<choose><option></option></choose>", you could add other options. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- But that would imply that Discovery's broadcasting output changes occasionally. I can't believe nobody has swapped over one of the pictures to a pornographic one yet. That's what I'd do if I was a vandal. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- But that would imply that Discovery's broadcasting output changes occasionally. I can't believe nobody has swapped over one of the pictures to a pornographic one yet. That's what I'd do if I was a vandal. Rabbi Techno
- Don't worry, I still think it's great. Additionally, with "<choose><option></option></choose>", you could add other options. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
This article's got a great concept and all, but I'm afraid it just doesn't apply anymore, seeing as Discovery Channel deteriorated into a puddle of people-stuff shows, god-awful puns, destroy-things-and-call-it-science-gimmicks, and Newton-worshipping years ago. If anyone would ask for my opinion, I'd actually suggest just changing the name to National Geographic (channel), as it's more in accordance with that channel's content. Anyone for the YAY? --Thandruin 20:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)