Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive16

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.

Boba Fett

Not up to quality standards. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Bad---User:Alfred 01:52, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. Fed to that thing with the teeth. You know, the giant Sand Vagina of Tattooine. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince!.gif 18:42, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Asian Chicks

Delete: Nothing is stupider than a bunch of horny British expats who think they're funny. An article on Asian Chicks could be so much funnier than a list of fucking hackneyed stereotypes and Pataya jokes. --Dr. Destructo

Cash on delivery

Delete: Not funny and the claim of wikipedia plagarism rubs me the wrong way, true or not. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 08:11, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Zaphod Beeblebrox

Delete. The page is nothing but a Ballmer quote and a See Also: section. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Nigger Claus

Delete. It wasn't funny and is guaranteed to offend a good amount of people. --neoEva88 23:18, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Surely the whole purpose of Uncyclopedia is to offend as many people as possible! Nevertheless, load your rifles with Delete ammo, it's crap. Karma Llama 01:22, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Dylan

I'd reverted an anon-IP blanking this one, but in retrospect it's likely slandanity/rubbish and should be taken out and shot. --Carlb 21:35, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I believe it should be kept. It does look stupid, but it could go somewhere, I think.

Deleted. Article was pretty much crap that belonged on someone's LiveJournal, and it seems to be a crap magnet to boot. It got stuck to my feet all last week, and I'm not in the mood to keep scraping it off. But I could be wrong, in which case, some other admin can restore it (and possibly ban me from playing Admin until Tuesday when I've settled down). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince!.gif 16:56, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Crotch

Maybe I just don't get it, but it doesn't seem funny at all. --neoEva88 20:00, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hind quarter fractured, will never race again. Take it out and shoot it. --Carlb 20:08, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Most Horrific Act of Mass Murder in the History of Time

errrrr... does anybody really want this? It's been around for a while, but seems not to be much improved. Delete --DWIII 15:16, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kevin Moore

Delete. --neoEva88 14:21, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

1337:444444444!

Moved from QVFD. Delete; methinks we don't need to dilute the breathtaking poetic brilliance of AAAAAAAAA!. --DWIII 23:58, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete It sucks, formatting was actually in leet for some reason. --Clorox Yes, I'm American. No, I don't like George W. Bush. Please don't shoot. MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 00:27, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep About the formatting, it's unfinished. I actually just ran the thing through a 1337 translator. I'l finish the article. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 01:52, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete There are already too many original content-less concept pages (AAAAAAAAA!, the morse code one, Nihilism, etc.) let alone unoriginal modifications of them. --Spintherism 02:49, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Looks like spam to me. If I were in full control of the 1337 language edition of Uncyclopedia this would be on QVFD so fast...--Foo21 01:02, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete You Have Two Dicks was a much funnier copy-and-change-something article, and even that couldn't be saved. --EvilZak 21:08, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Pure crap. --Curious Larry 01:16, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Threeve, Zeight, Eleventy

The articles are too short on their own. I'll be combining them with the Making up numbers page. All the content I'll need has already been moved, so go ahead and delete these suckers. --neoEva88 23:09, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep I wrote a different article on eleventy before you did, and I want to see it kept. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 01:50, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Deleted I deleted these once for being unfunny stubs. neoEva88 whined, so I restored them until they were added to the main Making up numbers article he was working on, so that we had 1 big article, rather than 6-8 short stubby ones. A similar fate will be in store for the rest of the other number articles that I restored. Once they are merged into the main article, they can be whacked. And btw, the main article is starting to look pretty good. Kudos on taking small piles of crap and making them into a nice bit of artwork. Bone F clear.png Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 16:54, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comment One thing to watch when doing merge-and-delete is that you lose the article history and info on who wrote the darned thing. Merge and redirect is therefore often preferable if there's anything in the history worth keeping. --Carlb 04:18, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Martian colony pages

Not that it really needs voting on, but where else can I post it...

MarsMoon1, MarsMoon2, Sedna, XC9-412 & Who knows, who cares? were pages relating to Martian colonies which have now been merged to that one page. I have changed the links and the five pages can be sent to the bat fuck insane MarsMoon1 residents and deleted. --theRealSheep 15:23, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pichutah

Short, dumb, & not worth Undic. -- T. (talk) 14:50, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

This page is only advertising some russian forum and not funny at all. And above all, it's telling the truth! Delete it since I don't think someone will be willing to rewrite it. I, personally, has no desire to be funny about some unknown club. --Norro 03:16, 11 Nov 2005

Delete it. Author only writing about himself. Not funny and really annoying. --Norro 03:16, 11 Nov 2005

Deleted The fact that I can tell it sucks even with my very limited Russian comprehension means it must have been vary bad indeed.

The same as previours - Delete this piece of crap. There is no fun to read someone's praises to himself. Well, it whould be fun if there was a good humor about it, but there is not. It's just annoying. --Norro 03:16, 11 Nov 2005

Delete It looks pretty bad, but my Russian isn't so good so I won't delete it outright. --Spintherism 18:43, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Quiff

If this is an 'in joke' it should be marked as such. An admin has edited it at one point, so it must have some value I don't see. -- T. (talk) 05:33, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I believe it's an inside joke for Robyn Hitchcock and Glen Baxter fans, and possibly some other landmark cultural figures I'm less familiar with... Keep? --Johnny C. Raven 08:00, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

William Ashley

Short, unfunny crap. May be an inside joke/stab at someone. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 23:08, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Walt whitman

It was funnier here [1]. --Isra1337 23:06, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I concur. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 23:10, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Habermas

Mostly factual, politically bent, not funny. -- T. (talk) 21:07, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Dschinghis Khan

Long, not funny, full of broken links. Pointless. --Staxeon 08:48, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bedknobs

Absolute Crap --Poopy-doo-doo 03:13, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comment; Explain to me why, have you checked the context that the picture is used in? are you simply calling it a racist image (as per your comment in VFP) because I used an image of a black man/ or the word 'brown'? please, indulge me. The article the image is used in is Worst 100 Porn Movies of All Time, and the name 'Bedknobs and Brown dicks' is a phonetic play on the film 'Bedknobs and Broomsticks'. There was, and remains, absolutely no racist intent in this image, is this simply an attack of the ultra PC brigade, what's the issue? --Caiman 04:17, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Based on his other wonderful contributions, I am starting to smell troll. --Splaka 04:28, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep; no one can take offense at it who can't take offense at a hundred other pages first. Plus, it is well done and helps the page it is in. --Splaka 04:20, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Speedy Kept, Poopy-doo-doo is apparently just being an ass. --Splaka 04:53, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Desire

Seriously,wtf?--Foo21 20:17, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Zoey Jones

Huff; It seems to be vanity, as there is nothing noteworthy on google or en.wp. --Splaka 09:10, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ignore; The origin of Zoey Jones is in the husband article. It's not vanity, it's just an entirely made up piece of crap. --198.20.32.254 17:40, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)The Natch

Longest Words

Delete; unfunny & much too factual. --DWIII 03:33, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

|)3L337--Spintherism 01:03, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bruce Almighty

It's a mess. Not funny.--Sweet Indigo 20:52, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • I must break you. Keep Jack Cain 00:54, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

-It's only not funny to you because you either 1. Didn't read the Bruce Campbell article or 2. Have no sense of humor. I vote to KEEP it.Devkyu 01:30, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

OK, perhaps I was a little harsh. Keep it then. The problem is a I don't have a sense of humor, merely a sense of humour :)--Sweet Indigo 15:21, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Its cool. If you liked my stuff, most of the stuff in Category:Dominion is mine too. Jack Cain 16:30, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Kept. --Splaka 22:27, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

IRC Wars (video game)

Yeh, Idon't really get this. At all. It's a dump of an IRC convo. Not an encyclopedia article.--Fatal Error 02:41, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep. It's hilarious. --Nintendorulez 17:19, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Comment This happened in the Uncyclopedia IRC channel, so it is kinda an inside joke. Wikicities has a page for IRC quotes [2], which applies to #uncyclopedia quotes as well, but we have more funny quotes happen in #uncyclopedia so maybe we should have another page at uncyclopedia. --Paulgb 22:36, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Utter genius. Especially the lines by that 'Codeine' bloke, whoever he is. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:18, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Would be salvagable if not for those lines by that Codeine dude. --Savethemooses 01:41, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Since I'm not in there, it couldn't be funny. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 01:54, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
The opposite of whatever the next vote is --Spintherism 02:55, 7 ;Nov 2005 (UTC)
Neutral vote --—rc (t) 03:32, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Comment Cleaned up a bit and reformatted as per the other wargames. It also makes a perfect home for at least one orphaned image. MadMax 21:47, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Awesome. Had me laughing easily. User:Justplainuncool 9:19, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep: I think that it's pretty funny. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 01:10, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Sasuke

Oh look, an article about anal rape. Pity the author forgot to make it funny. --Carlb 23:50, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bleh! Kill it --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 10:00, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete sooner than possible. --DWIII 22:48, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Spintherism 02:57, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. This should've just gone on QVFD. --Nintendorulez 12:42, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Baleeted. --Savethemooses 13:00, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Template:Ballmer

It's overused to the point that it's no longer funny. Nobody seems to like it, and blanking the template makes no sense, as it is mostly a waste of diskspace. If someone wants to make a quote similar, they can hard code it and the Category:Steve Ballmer's Hitlist in the article itself. --sColdWhat 21:11, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

You're about a month too late on this. The template was VFD'd and blanked, until we had killed all the references to it on various pages, to avoid just making red-links which would encourage it to be recreated. Instead of simply un-blanking it, why don't you read the comments in it, and check the VFD history, eh? Bone F clear.png Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 22:59, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pussy Girl

Defeated --—rc (t) 19:05, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

A bad article.--Spintherism 04:36, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 10:02, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. --neoEva88 18:46, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Utter crap. Bye now please. -- T. (talk) 19:01, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Polititian

Another bad article.--Spintherism 04:36, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

And it's not even spelled correctly. Change to a redirect --Nintendorulez 20:36, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Deleted, a crappy article with the titel speled worng has no chance. The only link to it is this page. This is QVFD material. Not redirected because nothing links to it and it is not a common enough misspelling. --Paulgb 22:31, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Redirection circles (Redirect, Recycle, The song that never ends)

Killed Redirect and Recycle, and redirected The song that never ends to The Song That Never Ends. --Algorithm 23:41, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

One of these is more than enough. I'm undecided on the song that never ends, but Redirect and Recycle should be deleted. --Algorithm 01:48, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Agreed, a pain. I periodically clean out Special:Doubleredirects, ugh! I vote keep Recycle, change The song that never ends to non-redirect links (a link chain, as redirects it isn't as funny, it skips every other one), and delete the other. --Splaka 02:03, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Ditto. MadMax 23:23, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • I say burn the first two, and I second Splaka's solution for the song that never ends. --neoEva88 11:57, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I'd have deleted them already if there weren't so damn many of the things. --sping

Addendum: Category:Infinite_loop_pages, I have to delete this sort of thing once in a while too. More pruning? --Splaka 01:02, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ring around the Planet Day

What is this, even?

Delete. I have no idea, but I suspect it's a really screwed up inside joke or vanity page. Whatever it is, it should be burned. --neoEva88 01:36, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

New Terrible Jesii

Deleted Jeezus, Jezus and Crocodile Jesus --—rc (t) 04:36, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pruning the Jesii is like fighting the hydra. Props to the author of Disco Jesus, though. It pleases me.

  • Jezus Short and pointless
delete--Sarducci 13:15, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. --neoEva88 01:41, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Jeezus Poorly written, not funny, gratuitous hurricane Katrina Joke, crimes against humaninty
delete --Sarducci 13:15, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. --neoEva88 01:41, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep -- if you could. I probably shoulda stubbed this. Just wondering how to make a contribution. If it's that poorly written to you guys though after i get the next part in, please delete it. Don't wanna let a limp article live to be pointless and add nothing I suppose.
There are en awful lot og jesii pages already, and I don't see where this is going. A better way to contributeto the Jesii would be to rewrite/expand one of the minor Jesii that already exist, like dark or purple jesus or Jeez.--Sarducci 18:33, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Good idea -- alright. nuke it. ill try to put some more meat on the other minor jesii. yeah. delete
Delete --Sarducci 13:15, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. --neoEva88 01:41, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I gotta say, you certainly have your hands full, but you're doing a great job. I hope I have as much success with the Month Project. --neoEva88 01:40, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • I found a new one: Jesus hendrix. Is it worth fixing the capitalization? It does have a halfway decent pix. I haven't been following the Multiple Jesii project, though Jesus is just alright with me, Jesus is just alright, da da da da da (air guitar solo). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince!.gif 20:26, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, looks good. I think I will roll Jesus of nazareth into Jesus Hendrix, though. --Sarducci 21:07, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Template:BorgQuote

Adding to our existing quote-flood, BorgQuote isn't funny. I vote for deletion and for another ban on Nerd42 for making it and spreading it. Although I bet he'll come by and oppose my vote on that one. ;) Bone F clear.png Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 02:42, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, we have enough (1 is too many) canned quotes templates. Who wants a template that just inserts the same quote over and over? PS: I added the template-for-deletion template to it, to give the users a fair chance to vote. --Splaka 03:24, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
OK. I will stop using it if you like. However, nobody's told me not to, so I haven't disobeyed any admin's order so I don't see a reason for banning me. Did your goldfish just die? --Nerd42 04:15, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Keep on second thought, I'd better turn that into a vote 2 keep it ... but perhaps the quote could be edited to become funnier? --Nerd42 22:15, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete If it's particularly relevant to one or two pages, put the code directly on those pages. No need for a templaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaate. ---Spintherism 02:39, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Template:BorgQuote relevancy is irrelevent. resistance is futile ... j/k I mean it's part of Template:Killquote now, you know? --Nerd42 14:20, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

We need to get rid of all these bloody quote templates, they just encourage people to be forumlaic. That Ballmer thing wasn't even funny the first time I saw it, by the 100th time it hadn't got any funnier. --Carlos the Mean 03:53, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Image:Drinkinggameinstruction.PNG

Defeated --—rc (t) 17:38, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Ok, well, I'm nominating my own image for deletion so this should get done with pretty quickly. The image was used for The Uncyclopedia drinking game, but it has now been replaced by Image:Hand.jpg. So the image is orphaned and unecessary, burn it. --neoEva88 17:26, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Marvin Kennedy

Just seems like unfunny gibberish. --neoEva88 04:08, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete - I agree with neoEva88. --Cassiejn 00:08, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Sir AlexMW KUN PS FIYC 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete, but don't forget to add the content to 1000 Uncyclopedians Typing Hamlet. Which character would give this soliloquy? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince!.gif 19:04, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Smurf communism

Not only is this page not unencyclopedic but it is also directly copied from wikipeida itsef (at least who ever wrote it cited that...).--Jsonitsac 22:18, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete is in fact only a minor edit of a wikipedia article.--Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Naughty Night Nurses

Nice try, but it just doesn't seem funny to me. --neoEva88 22:15, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete people should be encouraged to write actual articles, not one-three sentece throwaway jokes.-Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Cursed Page Series

The Cursed Uncyclopedia Article, Template:CursedUser, and Uncyclopedia:Curse

This page was deleted without a proper vote which is not policy for pages which have had so many edits. So I restored it and put it here. --Paulgb Talk 01:35, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Against deletion - I think this (Uncyclopedia:Curse) is a decent article as long as you can keep it to one page. --Paulgb Talk 01:35, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Poor attempt at cashing off of "The Ring". It's ugly, and stupid tot he point of unfunny. I have given the user a chance to make it presentable and he has invariably failed. Mediocre idea, executed very poorly. Can it. --Sir Flammable KUN 01:38, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep it please The joke requires the use of two pages. But that is it. One page is cursed, the other is not and is a warning. The warning is Uncyclopedia:Curse. Oh, and there's the template Template:CursedUser but if you like, that one can be deleted and removed from the legend. ... I thought it would be kinda fun though ... to have a sort of group of cursed people you know? --Nerd42 01:38, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I think the actual cursed page is unneccisary. It makes the legend less mysterious for the page to actually exists. I am against having more than one page for this idea. --Paulgb Talk 01:42, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

oh, and if this series does get deleted, please give me time to copy all the code and images of the latest version so I can host it on my own wiki when/if I start one. --Nerd42 01:40, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete didn't make me laugh anyways. --Splaka 01:49, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete The legend is based on the actions of an alleged "corrupt admin". There's no such thing. (Reasonable people that we are, if anybody feels they have any evidence to the contrary, we'd be happy to discuss it with you here) --Spintherism 03:32, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I did not add the corrupt admin bit. Since, may I remind you, this is a wiki, you can edit that bit out. Come to think of it, maybe corrupt admins do exist, the way everything's getting burned instead of edited around here. Why not lock down the entire site? --Nerd42 13:28, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I think perhaps the first article could be deleted. I think the last one about the cursed article should stay, though it begs for a major overhaul. I think we should keep the user template no matter what. --neoEva88 19:43, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
You know what? I've changed my mind. Go ahead. Delete the crap out of it. I'll just move it to another wiki. I've been working on setting up one today ... --Nerd42 20:20, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

keep and some one replace the template it makes the joke fun... cmon folks lets have some fun. --Illogicalbeats

No, it's been moved to Bluwiki. See my User Page for details. --Nerd42 12:59, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Mambo Kurt

Nothing on this page but a template. (Which adds no humor so it hardly counts as content.) The creator hasn't done anything to it for a month. I say we give him some time to react to the VFD tag, and if he doesn't do anything, burn it. --neoEva88 19:26, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • Comment I suppose you could always move it to a template for German Chancellors. MadMax 21:17, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I beleive I have remedied the situation. Rangeley 21:20, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree with Rangeley, it looks excellent and the matter has been dealt with. --neoEva88 22:10, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Scrufd

Lame stub. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Erector Set

Stubbed since May. I wouldn't say it's worth Undictionary. YMMV. -- T. (talk) 05:50, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nuked: --Ogopogo 06:00, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Those wild rambuctuous space aliens in Sector 9

Like a broken pencil (pointless). -- T. (talk) 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Django

delete gone through many revisions,, yet remains short and crappy. --Sarducci 16:39, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete. It's short and I don't get the joke. --Cassiejn 21:27, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete Well, Django is a charachter from the GBA game Boktai, but it doesn't seem related here.--Sir AlexMW KUN PS FIYC 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete.' No content worth saving. --neoEva88 22:41, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Jesus H. Christo

Delete A not very funny stub. Reduntant with many other highly-fleshed out Jesii; even if expanded what would go here that's not already in Jesus H. Christ, Original Jesus, Jesus Christ, etc. Finally, this character isn't in the President of the World Series, anyway.--Sarducci 15:52, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)


Also, see below for some other Jesii pages up for deletion.--Sarducci 15:52, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Sir AlexMW KUN PS FIYC 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Head Crab

Genital references and toilet humour do not something funny make! --Malleus 09:32, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

delete agreed. Uncyclopedia needs less potty humor.--Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete thirded. I get it, but it's too short and only has one basic joke. --Cassiejn 00:09, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Sir AlexMW KUN PS FIYC 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Such humor should only be tolerated unless it's legitimately funny. And by funny, I man it'd better be hilarious. --neoEva88 20:36, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Anime fanatics

Delete Just sounds like someone who's really angry at Anime fanatics, no humor involved --Wingzerotype 21:20, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep and Rewrite I think there is a slight possibility of this article becoming funny if it is developed and somehow ceases to be fish poo. The main trouble with it is that it's true --Nerd42 22:08, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep. The article isn't especially funny, but shows a lot of promise. --neoEva88 22:40, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Jason kim, Murrinator and Ricky

I wasn't quite sure what to do with these... They look like they took a fair while to write, and they really aren't all that funny. Besides, they're vanity pages, right? And Vanity pages are bad, I think... --Malleus 12:04, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Maybe find who the authors are and move them to the author pages?--Distinction 15:55, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Userfy if we can. --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:40, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

All three pages were created and modified by the same group of anonymous IP addresses, with no usernames to be found. I bet it's a copy and paste job from their LiveJournals. I'm going to take advantage of your largesse and use my Godlike admin powers to finish them off. Color them red for gone (and spank me if I've been a bad boy (oh yes, yes, please)). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince!.gif 22:53, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Mr.Richardson's chemistry class

Vanity page. Can never stand up to Uncyclopedia's rigorously high standards. General Specific 02:41, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Delete like the wind General Specific 02:41, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Assimilate --Nerd42 15:19, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Triangel

One of the angel/angle pun pages. Isn't especially funny though. I suggest that the image be deleted too since a similiar picture could be produced using the </math> tag. --neoEva88 01:16, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Baghdad

Could be funny as a rewrite but as is tomany redirects Burn it! --Illogicalbeats

I'll just burn it unilaterally. Not really worth a vote. --Spintherism 22:26, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Ellis Island

Sat to long as stub there seems to be no interest in helping it it --Illogicalbeats

Azis

Inactive since August, not especially funny. I say give the author some time, and then burn it. --neoEva88 19:46, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Aspull

  • Delete -- I don't see the joke. Also, the page doesn't follow wiki formatting conventions. --Cassiejn 05:35, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Huffed, QVFD quality. --—rc (t) 05:37, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Sean

Vanity. --Mosquitopsu 18:30, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--neoEva88 19:43, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Interflop

IMO, it just seems like stupid gibberish. neoEva88 02:35, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Interflop.com

Stupid and offensive, which would be forgivable if it were funny, but it's not. neoEva88 02:35, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Jeff Bieszczak

Pure, unbridled vanity. --Poofers 22:45, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Rabid baptists

Seems to be aimed at an induvidual non-notable church congregation --sColdWhat 21:01, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Christian Nation

I'm almost sure this was pasted off someone's lame blog: "A fallacy perpetrated upon the American citizenry in a thinly veiled attempt to establish a theocracy based upon a narrowly defined and warped fundamentalist ideology. Primary tactics include fear and hate mongering while espousing self righteousness and piety." That is all that is in this article. It sux. It's not funny. Nuke it!!! Nerd42 19:46, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

More QVFD material. --Spintherism 20:40, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Category:Exceptionalism

This page has been up since May and has NOTHING in it. --Kafeithekeaton 17:33, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Foxxxxxxxxxx 18:30, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

What are you voting for Foxx?--Spintherism 20:39, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Nintendogs

KeepI think that this article is very funny,especaly the features!

Delete You thought wrong... ly. --Spintherism 20:39, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Intestinal implosion

Delete. This article seems to have been written by a thrid grader. -Loony Jesty

Felch

Delete This article is less than pointless. --Kintar 18:05, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC) delete lousy.

Retrieved from "https://uncyclopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive16&oldid=4708815"