From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 19.5 new balloon species
|
| Nominated by:
|
Tagstit talk contribs awards 07:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 22.5
|
- Nom and for This is probably one of my favorite articles concept-wise that I have written and it is something I wrote a while back. I redid it after some suggestions (and a little extra help) from Gerry, and fixed it up in some parts. I think it is ready now and want to see how it does. Tagstit talk contribs awards 07:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 11:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Inflated For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Some parts are "deflated," if you will, but the rest is... very... I'm tired of balloon metaphors at this point. Le Cejak • <15:59 May 30, 2009>
- For. Dame
  16:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 For. I go love balloons ! I want to be five again !!Romartus 16:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)- Needles from the sky! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:38, May 30
- Strong for I love this. I love you. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     04:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Agai-- I mean For. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool
 09:32 May 31 '09
- For User:Zeitgeist/sig 19:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- for who doesnt like ballons--Iwillkillyou333 20:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. 213.112.133.182 13:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. I like it! --72.88.105.73 16:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Nice. --UU - natter
 12:30, Jun 8
- For Yodel monkey 15:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. It made me laugh. Nameable • ((mumble?)) • 20:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 'FOAR!' 75.166.139.168 05:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)- for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- for -PET
 15:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Mario4576 20:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. -- DameViktoria
  - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 12:08, 13 Jun 12:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. I did a rather rushed audio version. Remove it if it sucks. T. (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- For As Guildy pointed out, the language could use a little clean up here and there, but overall I liked this. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN17:10, 13 Jun
- Strong for. You can't vote against a Tagstit article! --It's Me Bitches! Don't worry, I won't kill you. 17:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
- Against It's a good idea dn everything, but It's "deflated" like Cajek said. I didn't laugh really at all. Staircase CUNt 16:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Not feeling it, sorry Tags. IronLung 02:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 Against. Per Above. It's a step down from Oscar.  Don   Puttano cHeDDs       01:54,9June,2009 01:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
The review is here. Gerry also did one on this, but I again, can't find it. Tagstit talk contribs awards 07:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- The other reviews are here and there. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
