| Vote
|
Score: 11 trite turns-of-phrases
|
| Nominated by:
|
Spıke Ѧ 20:11 4-Jan-13 20:11, January 4, 2013 (UTC)
|
For: 11
|
 Nom and for. Why does new user POUNDCAKE nominate at random an article on Snickers from 2007 by Insineratehymn, when nearby is her own masterpiece "in the style of" those of us who are Paid By Page Count? Spıke Ѧ 20:11 4-Jan-13- For. Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 20:34, January 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Jesus! it's a bloody fucking masterpiece. I am proud to be voting for it. Aleister 22:59 4-1-'13
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:03, 4 January 2013
- For. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:53, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
- For. It's, umm, good. --Imrealized ...hmm? 05:36, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
- For. this is ritten reel good ShabiDOO 00:15, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Funnybony
   13:43, Jan 6
- For. Equilateralperil 10:05, January 12, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Sog1970 (talk) 11:18, January 12, 2013 (UTC)
- For. per above. Mn-z 13:55, January 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
|
| Comments:
|
- Comment. Hack writers are pens for hire but not sure if the spelling mistakes really add to the humour. It is otherwise there in my view.
 RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:01, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:59, January 13, 2013 (UTC)