Uncyclopedia:VFH/Half-hedgehoglessness

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Half-hedgehoglessness (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 3 fractional prickly bastard(s)
Nominated by:	Sog1970 (talk) 09:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
For: 3	For. A significant philosophical work of international consequence. Sog1970 (talk) 09:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC) For. I will never look at a hedgehog quite the same after reading this anon/Sog edited wonder. RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC) For. Amusing nonsense. I admit I may be biased: I like hedgehogs in the first place. Dark Web, White Hat (talk) 23:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Against: 0
Comments:	Written by an anonymous author a million years ago, I have no idea what it means but it seems important. I've tarted it up and edited a little. Sog1970 (talk) 09:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Abstain. It's scholarly gibberish. Sadly, when even the title is scholarly gibberish, no one stumbles over it for fifteen years. Spıke 🎙️10:22 10-Apr-21 To my mind, it's the scholarly gibberish that gives it the charm. It makes at least as much sense as some of the Mathematical proofs I vaguely recall. And if no one has ever searched for it, that suggests it needs more publicity.Sog1970 (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC) I think : [File:Dissected_hedgehog.jpg] is a little off-putting; the other images are fine. Maybe it's just the contrast with the cutesy image at the top that surprises me when I scroll down. Dark Web, White Hat (talk) 23:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC) You're allowed to edit an article even while under vote, but this photo is Soggy's work and he's right over there. Try to persuade him off-line? Spıke 🎙️23:29 23-Apr-21

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article