From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 10 of an alarming number of legs 
|
| Nominated by:
|
UU - natter 
|
For: 15
|
- Nom & For. A Wizard Did It got featured. Do I need any more reason? What? You want one that's not an incitement to drama? OK, how about "I still think this is one of the funniest things I've been involved with"? That betterer? --UU - natter 12:59, Apr 29
- Death by excessive pinching FTW ~
 13:45, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. An entertaining ride if ever there was one. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:03, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Funny. Woody On Fire!
 Talking Woody Stalking Woody 22:08, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:13, 30 April 2010- For. ChiefjusticeGameCube 10:49, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 With Butter Please Ok, it took me three reads of the first graph to get the points-of-view, and then reading the page again after that it was even better. Now I see the genius of the writing, but I first had to remove the shell and get to the soft and succulent prose inside. Aleister in Chains 11:05 30 4 MMX- One of the best things I've read on here in ages. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 16:09, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
-
 For the, you know, the opposable thumb thing. Ha! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π ~  ~ 01 May 2010 ~ 03:38 (UTC)
 Oh GEAH!!! I am so voting for this again! This motherfucking motherfucker is motherfucking AWESOME!!! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 01 May 2010 ~ 03:42 (UTC)- For.
 TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  21:14, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —Pelozurian (talk) 23:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- LANGOSTAS! Fuck yeah,
 11:54, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Unpschyelopedia 13:28, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Aye. --Matfen 16:13, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- Against. Are you serious? This lobster should be boiled!
 DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 19:11, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry Against. If it wasn't for the people who have voted for this, I would assume this was another random article. So I'm assuming there's some inside jokes here that I haven't been here long enough to get. I did find some parts in the end amusing, but got completely lost in the first half of the article and only kept reading because I respect the for voters and figured I must be missing something. Also I'm not here I'm on vacation (and I just got an edit conflict). WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:05, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- You never know, that may be part of the joke... --UU - natter 21:09, Apr 29
- There are in jokes too?!? Man I gotta read this again! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 01 May 2010 ~ 03:40 (UTC)
- Against. Hasn't grown on me since the last time there was a move to feature this.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:24, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Sadly, I have no idea what people are finding so funny about this... -- Sir SF13 (Talk)
 GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 00:23 EST 4 May, 2010
 Weak against. Argh, this was close. But it's just not quite good enough for me. I would vote for it on VFG.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) 03:11, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
