HowTo talk:Solve The 1x1x1 Rubik's Cube

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

cube[edit]

on the "shortest possible instant of time", why not put the planck time of 5.39121 × 10-44 s ? Doublez 10:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Because on my article, we only talk about the movement of electrons as stated in the wave model. --Dondonz 10:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I found the hidden message ... do I get a prize? :) --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 20:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Of course you do. You get a reply! --Dondonz 10:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I solved the 1x1x1 Rubik's Cube and I earned a penny for my efforts. --General Insineratehymn 18:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

I also solved it! However, all I got was this SPEC-TAC-ULAR T-Shirt! --Don't click here! I need to work on that page. (Like, now. Hm.) 12:53, May 31, 2011 (UTC)


Where do you buy these? I'd like to solve it --the ghostlessness 08:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC) User:Aewanko

Oh man[edit]

It just gets better every time I read it. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Number of positions[edit]

The article is incorrect, since you are required to choose a top colour and then rotate it to that colour, then the other colours etc, there are 6 x 4 = 24 positions. Nevertheless, my cat succeeded in solving it several times before finally losing it under the sofa. Spinningspark 22:30, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

picture[edit]

couldn't this use a real picture? Someone's got to have one, there're so many YouTube solution videos for the 1x1x1 cube. 76.66.193.119 11:32, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

scrambling[edit]

Should add a paragraph about how to scramble it. could say something about that the most efficient way to do it is to roll it like a dice. :-) The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.166.18.131 (talk • contribs)

a note on 'Centre cubes' in 'Meet Your Cube'[edit]

1. On my cubes blue is opposite green and white is opposite yellow but unfortunately this does not in any way reduce the complexity of the 1x1x1 cube!

2. In fact for a standard Rubik's Cube it is not true that it can be solved with any of the centre cubes in any of four rotations. True is that 5 of the 6 centre cubes may have any rotation but for the last centre cube only 2 of the 4 positions may occur in reality. I don't have a mathematical proof for this because I really do not know anything about group theory but on a real cube I never managed to solve the cube with arbitrary rotations for ALL centre cubes. Bit still this makes the 1x1x1 cube over a thousand times (4x4x4x4x4x2 = 2048) as difficult to solve as the standard Rubik's cube.--88.217.103.190 09:50, June 12, 2016 (UTC)