Uncyclopedia:VFH/summary

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Welcome to the Uncyclopedia Votes for Highlight page. To nominate an article, type the name into the box below and follow the directions.
  • Vote for an article you find excellent.
  • Previous featured articles can be found in the VFH archive.
  • Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
  • Nominations of articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, UnTunes, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are welcomed.
  • If a nomination disappears from this page, it is likely to be found in either the recently featured or recently failed nomination lists.
  • If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
  • For how to feature and fail articles, see this page.
Any and all violators of policy will be crushed by a piano dropped from a 60-story building.

View recent changes for VFH. Deleted entries might still appear on this list. Purge.

Current nominations

# Article Score Nominator Nom age Health
1. Roller derby (nomination) (vote) Mark as voted onVoted ✔ 1 ( 1 / 0 )sm=n Spike 10 dayssm=n 8%
2. Mughal Road (nomination) (vote) Mark as voted onVoted ✔ 0 ( 0 / 0 )sm=n Spike 39 dayssm=n 0%
3. Pensacola (nomination) (vote) Mark as voted onVoted ✔ -1 ( 0 / 1 )sm=n Factfinder 64 dayssm=n -2%
4. White People (nomination) (vote) Mark as voted onVoted ✔ {{Votevfh.dpl3|article=White People nom=Factfinder510 (talk) 07:42, February 27, 2019 (UTC) scoretext= fornumber=2 for=
  1. Symbol for vote.svg For.--Factfinder510 (discuss my reason it's expanded.) 07:42, February 27, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Strong For Ratbert (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
againstnumber=3 against=
  1. Seems to be going for being factual and critical in an exaggerated way. That's a particular writing style but not one I think fits here, unless the subject calls for it somehow. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr talkcontribs • 17:30 3 March 2019
  2. Symbol against vote.svg Against. Don't want to read the whole thing; maybe it's the wall-of-text quotations or the very small print. And when my eyes alight somewhere, what they see is hackneyed stereotypes. Spıke Radiomicrophone.gif04:39 28-Jun-19
  3. Symbol against vote.svg Against. Overwritten and not funny either. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
comments=Expanded to match up with Paula Deen, Florida, and Fan Fiction,
  • I am not sure. It is pretty good but maybe could be improved. Binky The WonderSkull (talk) 02:27, March 14, 2019 (UTC)
  • that was not easy to improve upon that one when you had them interlinking, check out SNL to see something noteworthy. Luke Perry falls under fact is stranger than fiction so put that in account when voting Symbol for vote.svg For. or Against because the admins told me they do fact check the media ----Factfinder510 (talk) 15:50, March 25, 2019 (UTC)
%TITLE%=VFH/White People|%DATE%=27 Feb 2019|%USER%=Factfinder510|%ARGS%=§article=White People

§nom=User:Factfinder510§Factfinder510 (User talk:Factfinder510§talk) 07:42, February 27, 2019 (UTC) §scoretext= §fornumber=2 §for=

  1. {For}--User:Factfinder510§Factfinder510 (User talk:Factfinder510§discuss my reason it's expanded.) 07:42, February 27, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Strong For User:Ratbert§Ratbert (User talk:Ratbert§talk) 20:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

§againstnumber=3 §against=

  1. Seems to be going for being factual and critical in an exaggerated way. That's a particular writing style but not one I think fits here, unless the subject calls for it somehow. {User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig§20190303173056}
  2. {Against} Don't want to read the whole thing; maybe it's the wall-of-text quotations or the very small print. And when my eyes alight somewhere, what they see is hackneyed stereotypes. {User:Spike/signature}04:39 28-Jun-19
  3. {Against} Overwritten and not funny either. --{User:Romartus/sig2} 16:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

§comments=Expanded to match up with Paula Deen, Florida, and Fan Fiction,

}}sm=n

Factfinder510 146 dayssm=n score={{Votevfh.dpl2|article=White People nom=Factfinder510 (talk) 07:42, February 27, 2019 (UTC) scoretext= fornumber=2 for=
  1. Symbol for vote.svg For.--Factfinder510 (discuss my reason it's expanded.) 07:42, February 27, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Strong For Ratbert (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
againstnumber=3 against=
  1. Seems to be going for being factual and critical in an exaggerated way. That's a particular writing style but not one I think fits here, unless the subject calls for it somehow. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr talkcontribs • 17:30 3 March 2019
  2. Symbol against vote.svg Against. Don't want to read the whole thing; maybe it's the wall-of-text quotations or the very small print. And when my eyes alight somewhere, what they see is hackneyed stereotypes. Spıke Radiomicrophone.gif04:39 28-Jun-19
  3. Symbol against vote.svg Against. Overwritten and not funny either. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
comments=Expanded to match up with Paula Deen, Florida, and Fan Fiction,
  • I am not sure. It is pretty good but maybe could be improved. Binky The WonderSkull (talk) 02:27, March 14, 2019 (UTC)
  • that was not easy to improve upon that one when you had them interlinking, check out SNL to see something noteworthy. Luke Perry falls under fact is stranger than fiction so put that in account when voting Symbol for vote.svg For. or Against because the admins told me they do fact check the media ----Factfinder510 (talk) 15:50, March 25, 2019 (UTC)
%TITLE%=VFH/White People|%DATE%=27 Feb 2019|%USER%=Factfinder510|%ARGS%=§article=White People

§nom=User:Factfinder510§Factfinder510 (User talk:Factfinder510§talk) 07:42, February 27, 2019 (UTC) §scoretext= §fornumber=2 §for=

  1. {For}--User:Factfinder510§Factfinder510 (User talk:Factfinder510§discuss my reason it's expanded.) 07:42, February 27, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Strong For User:Ratbert§Ratbert (User talk:Ratbert§talk) 20:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

§againstnumber=3 §against=

  1. Seems to be going for being factual and critical in an exaggerated way. That's a particular writing style but not one I think fits here, unless the subject calls for it somehow. {User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig§20190303173056}
  2. {Against} Don't want to read the whole thing; maybe it's the wall-of-text quotations or the very small print. And when my eyes alight somewhere, what they see is hackneyed stereotypes. {User:Spike/signature}04:39 28-Jun-19
  3. {Against} Overwritten and not funny either. --{User:Romartus/sig2} 16:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

§comments=Expanded to match up with Paula Deen, Florida, and Fan Fiction,

}}|age=146}}

Want a feature that lets you mark the articles you've already voted on? Follow the instructions here to enable it.

Nominate an article

You (yes, you!) can nominate an article for featuring. To do so, put its name (or article name (2nd nomination) if it's been nominated before) into the box below, press Nominate, and follow the instructions on the next page. Simple!


VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.


Old VFH archives

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14