Talk:Politician

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Politician article. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that. For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

		This article was nominated for deletion on August 6, 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Comments

Any comments? --Winstanley1 12:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't get it *cries*

Not that I am for Donald Trump, but showing him as a sock is very inappropriate, which might show a politic opinion in the eyes of some people, that should not involve in the article. --Gabriel734 (talk) 16:09, April 29, 2016 (UTC)

From Pee Review 1

I rewrote this to make it appear as if politicians have a personality disorder, Any comments on how to improve it would be appreciated. Feel free to add to it. --Winstanley1 12:25, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

i've made some changes. i'll make more tomorrow. i think we ought to project that these people are actually sick (which unequivocally they are) rather than openly or bluntly deriding/exposing their behavior. -- mowgli 20:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Good point, i did go a bit overboard with the whole, 'psychotic' idea. I'll try and tone some of it down. --Winstanley1 22:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

The number of spelling mistakes I just corrected is unbelievable. I would suggest writing with a word processor from now on, then copying the result to the wiki edit box for further editing. ~ T. (talk) 14:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

From Pee Review 2

A rewrite of my rewrite of the origional article, any help to improve this would eb appreciated as i'm running out of ideas, i also need a way to make the article look more interesting.

--Winstanley1 14:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Pee Review 3!

I started this ages ago then became hopelessly stuck while trying to avoid the usual political cliches about about vampires and lies. Basically it's crap, but if someone could finish or improve it, that would be very helpful.--Winstanley1 22:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	7	You've got the standard political deviation nailed. Seems a little lacking, though.
Concept:	7	There are better directions this might have gone, but it seems good enough of a concept.
Prose and formatting:	4	The images aren't lined up very well. Pop the picture of nixon on the right side.
Images:	5	Seems to be too many pictures for the amount of text
Miscellaneous:	10	I'm not even sure what to put in the misc category.
Final Score:	33	Simply put, just expand your article a bit and add fix the formatting issues.
Reviewer:	--~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 02:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

italicized article is italic!