Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Isn't there a toilet in the woods? (quick)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Why?:Isn't there a toilet in the woods?[edit]
Although this was reviewed by Gerry already, I've tweaked up some of the issues he pointed out and I'm resubmitting it for a quick review. He said, and I agree, that this article may polarize readers yuky doody style. So a quickie would be nice.
Mr. Monkey 
Pant-hoot here. 21:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
| Humour: | 10 | Starts out slow, and then builds to beautiful crescendo. Fucking classic. |
| Concept: | 10 | Wonderful idea, can't believe you're the first to think of it |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | Wonderfully written, perfect tone |
| Images: | 10 | The pictures are quite simplistic, but the captions make them. |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | Great Article, one of the best I've seen in a long time |
| Final Score: | 50 | Holy Shit, feature this Fucker!! |
| Reviewer: | --WhySoSerious 22:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |
"What the fuck" was much funnier than "what the hell". Who ruined the article? ~~Rascal
- Feel free to edit it back if you feel it's better that way: personally, I don't have a preference. Also, if you liked it (since you apparently read it) go vote for it on Vote for Highlight. --Mr. Monkey
Pant-hoot here. 18:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Me? No way. I let the author do whatever he wants with it, I don't care. I just thought it was way funnier before. The word "hell" just doesn't seem to convey the feeling of surprise in the same way. ~~Rascal
- Fair enough, but as I said, go here if you liked it. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but as I said, go here if you liked it. --Mr. Monkey
- Me? No way. I let the author do whatever he wants with it, I don't care. I just thought it was way funnier before. The word "hell" just doesn't seem to convey the feeling of surprise in the same way. ~~Rascal