Forum:Benson Service Dept.

Forums: Index > BHOP > Benson Service Dept.

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6196 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

So... are you disillusioned with your BENSON? has your BENSON failed you? are you looking to find a replacement BENSON? do you want to make a full return (with a receipt)? or perhaps BENSON touched you inappropriately? well, just point on the dolly exactly where and we'll get that sorted out for you.

Otherwise... any Anti-Bensonites or non-followers may also post related comments --Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

The answer to all those questions is a resounding NO. The ALL CAPS kind. BENSON is still better than you. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

then why did you post? --Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 06:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

While I'm not a fan of most of their albums, Benson rocks live. The light show alone is phenominal. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

"Phenomenal" is the word thou wert searching for, I think, Modusoperandi. --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens 11:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm still a bit stunned from the phenominal light show. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I think very few people understant the influence Benson have had on popular music. Sure, they did write lots of crap like Evolution No. 7, but remember they did have that guy who played flaming guitars with his teeth and a cello bow while simultaneously smashing the guitar against the ground. What was his name again? Jimi Benson Van Page, or something like that? They truly were phenominal. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Jimi Benson Van Page? Sounds like a fake Benson. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

No, you're thinking of The Fake Benson Four. Different band altogether. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Right, thanks for clearing that up. No wonder my muso friends thought I was weird. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but there can only be one true BENSON. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. But the record company decided he needed to get 3 other band members, so that they could appeal to a wider audience. —Braydie 06:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

BENSON is his own record company. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Benson Universal Music. Obviously. BUM used to be considered a major label. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

SPANKY SPANKY --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

It happens that Benson may be featured in an Uncyclopedia text adventure! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

Yes! It's true! --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 21:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I wish to complain.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 20:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

About this Benson you purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique? --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 00:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Stop. This is a dead parrot sketch-free zone. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Monsieur Modusoperandi, vous êtes le party-pooper. Vous n'avez pas moutons avions? Vous devez puet-être ignorez ça remarque. Et tous, ne plaindrez pas au sujet de utiliser de Français, s'il vous plait. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 07:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Although it's got some good lines, I hate the parrot sketch. Heresy, I know, but I don't find John Cleese yelling to be funny. Also, I barely speak english rightly. To reply en Francais would be an exercise in futility. And it's "peut-être". --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

:-( This parrot of the parrot-sketch has ceased to be. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

And lo, a harmless joke did become a source of great unfunniness and misspelled French (I will never forgive myself for that). Open your eyes, people! Don't you see what our absent-minded and incessant references to Monty Python have done to those poor few who do not mindlessly revel in its glory? They have become so sensitive to it that it is practically a knee-jerk reaction for them to point out even semi-obscured references and quash them, with results that you can see right in front of you. Also, he mocked my shitty French. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 07:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Don't get me wrong. I like Monty Python, just not that sketch. I think people only mention it to annoy me. People are like that. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, we're all out to bug you. I wouldn't be surprised if the Pythons wrote that sketch with you in mind. After all, I know for a fact that "Reality" television shows were invented specifically to irritate me. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 09:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I would tell you what I was really wishing to complain about, but once Modus has touched your post, you just can't get it back on track. Modus, stop touching me! Well, I said it after all...---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 05:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

I would be offended, but it's all a part of my master plan to somethingsomethingsomething. I'd be more specific, but you spilled Cherry Coke all over my notebook, and everything went all smeary. So, in a way, this is all your fault. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry, I remember the plan. After somethingsomethingsomething comes profit. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 12:22, 11 May 2007