Talk:Blank Page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blank Page article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.

Article policies

Nihilism[edit]

Don't we already have something like this? Efitu (T W @) 12:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Seeing as the differences are such that Blank Page comes off the worse, I am most certainly for a simple redirect, as is done with Blank page (lowercase) and Blank. Anyone else? —Lenoxus 23:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I think it's unique. Keep them both. Conniving 18:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Blank, Blank page, and Blank Page are all non-psuedo-religious. Nihilism is. They're seperate. I think Blank & Co should all be completely blank, not just with the content removed. ie, all-white, not even Sophie showing, as it is now(for me, at least) --Ekashp 04:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

We also need "This Page Intentionally Left Blank" somewhere. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.20.97.220 (talk • contribs)

i don't know if making the whole page completely blank would be possible. that way, the article... well, it says nothing. anyway, this page is completely different form Nihilism, I think. Pangusto 04:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

CSS[edit]

Whate we need is the CSS that was on Talk:International Page Blanking Day for this article. ~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

1/11/2007 @ 20:05

Media:Nihilism.png[edit]

Why not redirect Blank Page, as well as Blank page, Blank article, Blank, Blanky and Blankity blank to Media:Nihilism.png, that page is truly blank. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.165.224.11 (talk • contribs)

The redirect doesn't work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.165.224.11 (talk • contribs)

It may still be considerable to change the links in the articles linking to this "blank" stuff. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.165.224.11 (talk • contribs)

It's still working isn't it? DJ Mixerr 03:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)DJ Mixerr

Well...[edit]

I think this is teh best thing to do. MUAHAHAHAHA!--98.169.6.136 01:57, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

I completely agree. *conspiring with each other*--Invincibleflamegruemaster 02:17, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

Featured[edit]

Why isn't this featured? --Mr.Soot Gremlin -Talk 13:20, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Shouldn't we remove the categories to make it even more blank? 92.16.16.151 16:40, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

See nihilism.

1 2 3 4 ~ 16:52, 12 January 2012

Redundant[edit]

This page is made redundant by the article on Nothing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 123.211.108.223 (talk • contribs)