Talk:International Page Blanking Day

This article has been intentionally left blank Except for this message box claiming blankness Which is probably just a figment of your imagination anyway Why don't you go somewhere else and stop worrying about it! Ya paranoid.

		This article was nominated for deletion on February 8, 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Okay, that should do it. Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Just so you know

Check the page history Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?

Was that all really necessary? When you think about it, you'd have to get a sockpuppet for the joke to work, which would probably lead to the same banning that blanking does. Sheesh... ;D —Lenoxus 02:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

How rude... well, I like International Page Blanking Day anyway, socks or no socks! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Aw, it was just friendly joshing… oh, socks… — Lenoxus 03:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

This page isn't blank enough! --BiT 23:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Needs more blank.. --BiT 23:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree. --BiT 23:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Competition

We should have a competition on who can make the best version of this page. here's mine. ---- Kip > Talk • Works • •

Here's mine... Without the blank that is.. --BiT 23:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Revert?

Who made a revert on the talk page? Talk pages are not to hide topics of conversation you do not like. I've put this BACK. Even if the original author of the topic removed made the change, the fact that someone else had already commented means that it should be left alone.

I have a feeling (be it right or be it wrong) that the person who keeps calling for article lockage might have made this revision. If such is the case, please do not do this again. You might like the article the way it is, but until you can actually GET the artcle locked, don't doctor with anything that promotes change.

If you did not do the changing, then accept my apology for pointing fingers. --Aredvark 23:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't get it. This is your only edit to this page. Anyway, yes, maybe I will try to get the article locked soon. It is a good idea. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

I've updated on the main page, so I get sent talk page notifications even when I don't personally edit them. It was because of that (and a bit of chance) that I saw someone had reverted away the Competition topic. So I reversed the ridiculous revert. --Aredvark 00:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and-- I don't care personally if the main page gets locked. I simply feel that if someone doesn't like the idea of a page changing competition, they should find other means to deal with it. --Aredvark 00:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

What page-changing competition? What? I am more and more confused by the second! Are we talking about this talk page, or the actual page? Are you having me on? What's going on? /me goes to have a lie-down. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Obviously you are not involved, and I must apologize for making assumptions. Someone had reverted the talk page to remove a topic of discussion. I admitted in my first post that I had a (now disproven) hunch that the offender was the one upset at new edits on the main article. My section here on the talk page was to let people know that I placed the reverted segment BACK onto the page and requested that offender not strike again.

I really hope that makes sense this time around. Otherwise, just smile and nod and we'll pretend it does. >_< *Offers a pillow.* --Aredvark 03:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

/me smiles and nods. Oh well, I can't see anything wrong that you've done, anyway! :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

CSS

Try this as the CSS for the page:

body { display: none; }

--~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

02:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

We shouldn't really need any fancy CSS for this one. If that does what I think it does, it does a bit more than a user could do in terms of page-blanking! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

If it's international page blanking day, wouldn't the admins participate? :P ~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

20/09/2007 @ 02:29

Protected

At least until I can prune out some of the more rubbish edits to this. Any objections? -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Against Not highfalutin' enough.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Huh? -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:19, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Feature Exactly.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete Oh - I get it. :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Me so funny. I'm just waiting to be clocked for being retarded. One of these days, Alice....Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion:

Page Contents: {{title-left|<br/><br/>}}

EDIT: Forgot the nowiki tags.