From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 12.5 free lunches
|
| Nominated by:
|
Nikau 08:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 17.5
|
- I really like it Clever and funny. --Nikau 08:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 Let they God Mahm00sha bless thee who votes for this article. —The la Zhel 11:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC) For. User:Zeitgeist/sig 13:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)- For. per Nikau
 (talk) 16:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- God Bless. You --
   Whore cHeDDaR    20:39,10May,2009
- Great idea --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     07:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. A little short, but still very nice. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:16, May 11
- After reading it again, I'm changing my vote to For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Cute idea, I like. --UU - natter
 12:13, May 12
- Per UU ~Orian57~
 ~Talk~  14:05 12 May 2009
- For Don't change anything. Brevity is the soul of wit. Don't let 'em convince you it needs more.YouFang 06:19, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- for --Moneke 09:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Style
 Guide 10:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. 90.216.149.112 18:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Because, after rethinking it, there's no need to fix something that isn't broken. -- User:KneeChee27/sig 01:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 06:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:37, 20 May 2009
- For. Just like it SunnyChow 04:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- Against Cute, but the first and third sections didn't really make sense. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 17:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Uh since when did that matter on Uncyclopedia? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Against. per above. Mnb'z 16:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- against. a good concept, but needs more work before the front page. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 Against. I go along with the criticisms on this one. This is a 'positive against' if there is such a thing which suggests the article is in need of a rejig rather than a rewrite to pass for VFH. --Romartus 16:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)- Against. Needs better images. --LongLiverh3 21:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Against, only because it's a good article that could be a great one. I mean, I really liked it (a lot); though, I felt as if it could be even better with an additional section and one or two more images to compliment the article. -- User:KneeChee27/sig 01:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
Abstain. Some good stuff and some stuff which may need a bit of improving. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC)- Comment. I am voting neither for or against this one, but I would like to suggest the possibility of thisarticle morphing into a list of free lunches. Dorsalfrog Prime 15:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
07:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)