| Vote
|
Score: -4 morons wearing Snuggies
|
| Nominated by:
|
 Undernomeder 23:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 1
|
- 'Nom +
 Vote.' Stating the obvious, but funny. Undernomeder 23:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- Against. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:57, Aug 24
- Against. Random, unnecessary hyperbole, hops from first person to some kind of other person and back, etc. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Against Snuggie was much better in my opinion. Tagstit talk contribs awards 04:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Against Per everyone else Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 07:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Not that bad, not a feature. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
Also, as a self-nom, this requires a Pee Review, which I can't find. Is this because it doesn't have one, or have I gone blind? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- It is because it was self-nommed only moments after it was created, i.e. the former. Though you might wanna check on those eyes sometime soon. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. Because I don't think this is that good, but it doesn't deserve to be castigated quite the way that it is. Throw it onto PEEreview, and work on it. You'll probably need a couple of revisits to PEE, but there's enough in here to show you have some talent. Pup t 08:03, 24/08/2009 08:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
