| Vote
|
Score: -3 people blocking the way
|
| Nominated by:
|
~ Readmesoon
|
For: 2
|
- SN & F People were saying how they liked the article. I got it reviewed, made some touch ups, and wallah. ~ Readmesoon
- for. i thought it was original enough and garnered enough chuckles to merit a for vote. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- Against For me, there are two problems. The first, I've addressed before, and that is that it seems to blatantly copy the style of a lot of other stuff, namely Awkward Conversation. The second, though, is that there just aren't enough jokes in here. It sounds just like a normal conversation to me, not like a funny encounter, or something I'd laugh at if I saw it. In conclusion: Mudshark. -RAHB 23:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- No Way Sorry RMS but this style of writing never makes me laugh, it's like a humor black hole for me. They just bore me. Also what RAHB said about copying styles, don't do it. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     03:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 Against. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)- Against: per RAHB and DJ. --Mr. Monkey
 Pant-hoot here. 22:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Against. Porcina 08:52, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Vote stricken. Sockpuppet. -RAHB 09:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Against. Yeah, I kinda like the idea, but the execution less so. It feels kinda dull, and needs jazzing up somehow. --UU - natter
 10:17, Aug 26
|
| Comments:
|
- Just so everyone knows, I did not get the idea from awkward conversation. The idea just came to me. Don't ban me. ~ Readmesoon
- I really like RMS's determination, and this article, but it isn't really VFH style. Le Cejak • <20:45, 24 Aug 2008>
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
