| Vote
|
Score: 1 futures revealed
|
| Nominated by:
|
* Flumpa  04:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 3
|
 Self-Nom & For - I did a complete rewrite of this article, and I think I transformed it from a piece of crap to something VFH-worthy. * Flumpa 04:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)- Fo-rizzle - I PRd this article, and ill say it again: I'll vote for it. ~ NEZLR
     08:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- For, but it could still use a little work. --Sir Starnestommy
 (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 01:41, May. 19, 2008
|
Against: 2
|
- Against I like the idea, but it needs a little more than just arbitrary abuse. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 22:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 Against. - As Per Cap'n Ben--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 08:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
- YOU SUCK is about as far as the article got. But the fortune teller theme was funny so, abstain --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     07:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Abstain. I like the idea more than the execution. With some changes, I can see this really working, but as it is I just can't vote for it. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:19, May 20
- Defense - At least it doesn't look as bad as it did before I rewrote it, right? RIGHT????? * Flumpa 11:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't. That's a fact. However, although it was much better the article is not ready for feature IMO. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed - it's a big improvement, and as I say, with a few more changes, could really work. But it's not there yet. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:14, May 20
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
