Forum:For or against???

Forums: Index > BHOP > For or against???

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6227 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

...

You are not entitled to vote.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.

1 4!!

2 AGAINST.

3 Dunno

4 AAAAAAAAA!

5 Your mom

There were 0 votes since the poll was created on 16:33, 3 June 2021.

poll-id 890F7AA7EF37799B35FA463D388C0883

Votes

Score: π^¾

• For. I am in support. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • AGAINST What the hell was I thinking!?!? -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against It's just not that good, maybe add a bit more green text in the top right corner? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Pat Buchanan. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Neutral. This idea may or may not suck. Only time will tell. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• H. Ross Perot because he was right on the money about NAFTA and other trade agreements. That giant sucking sound we heard for the past 15 years or so were jobs going out of the USA. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 03:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Dagnabbit. This conflabbit gobbledygook of a page was written by nincompoops that don't know Hootenanny!--Grumpy Old Man (the good ol'days) 04:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --L 05:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA --AAAAAAAA AA:AA AA AAAAAAAAAA AAAA( AAAA)
  • Comment - I agree. Micoolio101 11:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
    • Comment - Me too. --General Insineratehymn 20:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Pie. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, voting on things is the cool thing to do! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 07:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Bat Fuck Insane. --General Insineratehymn 11:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Tompkins --Chronarion 15:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: It's the only votes I know how to cast. --Sir gwax (talk) 20:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Cite Sources this is unacceptable, I contest this information forthwith, and request it to be removed until it can be verified! --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 23:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -It's funny because it's true., but Against. However, It's funny because it's true. Great! Aaadddaaammm 06:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

• Er, refresh the page a bit, something's messed up with your comment and it's fucking up the page. I checked the templates, but don't see the root of the problem. --User:Nintendorulez 14:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• Conditional for or against. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 07:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It wasn't properly nominated.--Procopius 13:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Forgainst. What are we talking about anyway?  –              Smiddle             
• For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 14:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• or --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• ↕ -- mowgli 07:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• I'm changing my vote. Sorry. -- mowgli 20:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Vote I am herby voting a vote.--no, yuo chat 12:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• SQUIGLE! -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 15:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain. I can't help but feel partially responsible for this. Whatever "this" is.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Fnord, but with some cheese, if you don't mind. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 00:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against, could do with some cleanup, and there's too much drama. But has lots of potential. --User:Nintendorulez 00:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • REMOVE THIS FROM THE SACRED LAND OF BENSON. --User:Nintendorulez 00:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• BENSON! Mrthejazz 00:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

• COMMENT YOU FORGET HIS MAJESTY'S ROYAL CAPS LOCK! --User:Nintendorulez 00:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• OH SHIT EDITED [[User:

• Maybe. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 06:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• DAMN! --Micoolio101 20:38, 17 October 2006 (OMG)
• 5. - User:Guest/sig 18:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Goose egg - What are we voting for, anyway? --AAA! (AAAA) 08:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For and a half! Hilarious!!! User:Wehpudicabok/sig 04:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• ForAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA oh AAAAA!!!! -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 20:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes? --AAA! (AAAA) 07:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• Second vote This time, for. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

STM are you a complete retard? Against -- » >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 09:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

• AAAAAAAAA! - It's the only one that makes any sense User:KWild/sig 15:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
• Against: 4!!, against, dunno, AAAAAAAAA, and your mom.--Math Poet 15:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• Four - I don't know what this is about, but it sounds like a good thing. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 19:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• For -- Because I never vote against, unless it's a vote an wether to ban something or someone, such as banning gay marriage or banning Nintendorulez --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 19:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• AAAAAAAAA!, because... —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 04/8 22:07