Forum:Oh my God
Check this out! Made me laugh. A lot. Codeine even liked it so much he protected it. --Andorin Kato 22:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- I forget. Do we nom it for VFD or VFH first? Or both? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 22:54 Nov 13, 2007
- Here we go again... Still, I've seen worse things get five minutes of fame. -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- VFD. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
It's good in a "so bad it's good" sort of way, but Guy Gets Crazy was better and it was (officially) deleted! Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- IT LIVES ON!!! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:32, Nov 14 - The concept seems obscure. It is funny in the same way as watching a pretty little toddler fall into an open sewer and drown. The language sux. It needs pictures, large ones that completely obscure the text. Pieface 04:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- roflcoptergasmcoastermao-- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 05:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 6 | Not bad, the sub context of Mr. Winkler could adore men rather than women is humorous. |
| Concept: | 10 | Originality is the thing baby! The thought of that poor teacher turning sides simply because he gave you an F because you didn't read some book! ADORABLE! |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | I love how you manipulate suxs, and GAY GAY GAY |
| Images: | 0 | perhaps some images of a penis? Perhaps Mr. Winlker's penis? |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | average, as per Cajek |
| Final Score: | 36 | FEATURE! FEATURE! FEATURE! GAY! GAY! SUX! |
| Reviewer: | ~ 07:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| Humour: | 6 | Vaguely amusing. |
| Concept: | 6 | A humorous review of a page. For shame Monsieur Mordillo; I believe it's been done. Don't quote me on that. I rarely let facts get in the way of my baseless accusations. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | The prose is prosaic, although the formatting gives me a wicked case of deja vu. |
| Images: | 4 | That spinning sig-thingy is making me dizzy. Your review needs more of that, if only to distract from the meat of the review itself. |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | In miscellany, your review excels. |
| Final Score: | 36 | I like candy. I do. |
| Reviewer: | Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC) | |
Restored again
Because a) there's just something about it that tickles me and b) I've most likely been an admin longer than you've been a user, so I JUST CAN. Oh and d) Profit. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Power abuse FTW! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 18:20, 14 Nov 2007
- Ha, things must be boring round here if we're talking about stuff like this. Oh and for your information, Mr. Wrinkler is launching a lawsuit as we talk....... maybe. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think that someone should write a response to it in the style of Mr. Wrinkler grading the work and pointing out the fallacies (like personal attacks, appeals to emotion, appeals to ignorance, false authority) and grammar errors in it, and then assigning a grade to it (D-). Then Mr. Wrinkler's lawyer writes a cease and desist letter to the student citing that it is a work of libel and that the student will be expelled as well as face a civil lawsuit. Then it should be followed up by an apology letter from the student to Mr. Wrinkler as part of the civil case being settled out of court as his parents could not afford the legal bills to defend their child in court. Maybe the student has to write "I will not libel Mr. Wrinkler." 500 times on a chalkboard in the style of Bart Simpson at the start of each "The Simpsons" episode. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 02:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'd pay money to actually see that on the real Simpsons. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think that someone should write a response to it in the style of Mr. Wrinkler grading the work and pointing out the fallacies (like personal attacks, appeals to emotion, appeals to ignorance, false authority) and grammar errors in it, and then assigning a grade to it (D-). Then Mr. Wrinkler's lawyer writes a cease and desist letter to the student citing that it is a work of libel and that the student will be expelled as well as face a civil lawsuit. Then it should be followed up by an apology letter from the student to Mr. Wrinkler as part of the civil case being settled out of court as his parents could not afford the legal bills to defend their child in court. Maybe the student has to write "I will not libel Mr. Wrinkler." 500 times on a chalkboard in the style of Bart Simpson at the start of each "The Simpsons" episode. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 02:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ha, things must be boring round here if we're talking about stuff like this. Oh and for your information, Mr. Wrinkler is launching a lawsuit as we talk....... maybe. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Haha! You can do anything with this Internet thingy! That should go in the retrospective wotsit. Oh and Mr. Groening, if you're reading (which I know you do cos I've seen Uncyc jokes on The Simpsons), my offer still stands. --- Hindleyite Converse 20:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm so using that image. --Andorin Kato 21:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
The thing I love the most about this article
...is the fact that he's clearly right. Mr Winkler is quite obviously a fucking dreadful English teacher. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 20:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- I can see it now: Mr. Wrinkler, a retrospective. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I'm working on that. --Andorin Kato 23:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, no, no. You cannot get nostalgic on a wiki until there is an entire generation of users who have no memory of the incident. Only then may you sit in your rocking chairs on the front porch of Uncyclopedia, chewing your cud like the cows you are, and lecture young 'uns on how back in your day, in your prime before you got all pruny, you had real articles like Mr winkler is GAY and Euroipods. Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" (cover your eyes!) 06:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- And Fisher Price (in my opinion, one of the better Uncyc in-jokes). --The Acceptable
Cainad 
(Fnord) 09:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- And Fisher Price (in my opinion, one of the better Uncyc in-jokes). --The Acceptable
- No, no, no. You cannot get nostalgic on a wiki until there is an entire generation of users who have no memory of the incident. Only then may you sit in your rocking chairs on the front porch of Uncyclopedia, chewing your cud like the cows you are, and lecture young 'uns on how back in your day, in your prime before you got all pruny, you had real articles like Mr winkler is GAY and Euroipods. Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" (cover your eyes!) 06:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I'm working on that. --Andorin Kato 23:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
(arbitrary outdent) I'm almost tempted to say this should be moved to Illogicopedia, but... I'm not sure they have a good tradition of tolerating such in-jokes... Pentium5dot1 06:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Actually, on second thought, that retrospective does seem to be worthwhile. Pentium5dot1 06:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- I am amazed no one realized that I called you all cows in my last entry. And pruny. Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" (cover your eyes!) 07:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
So I finally read the article, and I must say, it reminds me of the kids I teach. Also, I'm reminded of a time I got some sick, and I think it might have been from this actual child. Maybe Mr. Winkler is a codename for me. That's just too weird to be a coincidence.--<<
>> 23:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- I knew I should have just called it Mr Bradaphraser is GAY... --LotofLOLS not! 23:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)