Uncyclopedia:VFH/21st Century Nazis

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

21st Century Nazis (history, logs)

Score: -1.5 raped Irishmen

Nominated by:

- 06:42 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

For: 2
  1. Nom and For Hilarious and ironic.- 06:42 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
  2. Aw hell It's okay I guess. The author's obviously a moron though. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN15:41, 3 May
Against: 3.5
  1. Symbol against vote.svg Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
  2. Symbol against vote.svg Against. - so much setup, so little punchline... --Hyperbole 02:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  3. Non-Mhaille Nazi Article --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 21:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  4. Against. 209.40.211.110 21:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments:
  1. Symbol neutral vote.svg Abstain. - It's sort of funny, but also not. --SPY Administrator (Complain|I rock|In memoriam) HMRFRA Bluegarrisoncapsig.png Sucrose b.gif WH 20:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
  2. Symbol neutral vote.svg Abstain. I just watched Schindler's List T_T --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 12:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  3. Abstain And a reluctant one at that. I really want to vote for, because the sudden last section is comedically good. The overall concept is a good comedic idea and could spawn something incredibly funny. But, as Hyperbole said, there is a lot of setup, leading up to a small punchline. I really do like the punchline once the article gets around to it, but in order to properly advance the article along, there's got to be some more laughs along the way. Nothing that will detract from the final concept, but chuckles that keep the reader interested, rather than just copy-pasting thoughts about solving world issues. Make the other passages funny, and not just ironic overall. This article can be extremely good, if some more effort is put into it, and I wouldn't object to it being featured now, which is why I'm abstaining (though it doesn't look like it will be), but I'd particularly like to see this article improved upon to get it to a featurable state. Also, that opening picture at the top is absolutely perfect. Just as a side note. -RAHB 10:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH