Uncyclopedia:VFH/The Radio Star Murder

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

The Radio Star Murder (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 10.5 radio stars killed by video
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
For: 11.5	I love it! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC) For. Is nice Whore cHeDDaR 21:36,11May,2009 21:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Video Killed The Radio Star Video Killed The Radio Star |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 09:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC) For. ~ 09:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Yes   Le Cejak • <10:45 May 15, 2009> For. Too bad UU, I like it just fine. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:47, 15 May For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC) For. You're too hard on yourself UU, I like it. --Dame 16:00, 22 May 2009 (UTC) For User:Zeitgeist/sig 18:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC) For. It was very fun to read. Staircase CUNt 00:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC) For. MagaMaga 02:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC) For. 122.3.107.30 12:19, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 1	Against. I have no idea why so many people have chosen abstain. The article is amusing, but there isn't enough of it there to be a Great article. Good start, but needs more work. Needs way fewer links, they don't add much to the article or the humor. Suggestions include having a section on the investigation, adjusting the time periods so that the actual rise of Radio Star is in the proper time period, perhaps you could include things like the response from Texaco Star Theater to the tragedy and the downfall of Radio Star. Quasispace 07:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Comments moved to talk page. --UU - natter 08:01, May 24
Comments:	Abstain. Not good enough to vote for, in my opinion, but it isn't nearly bad enough to vote against. I don't feel strongly either way (talk) 21:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Wha? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Better? (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC) I was just a bit surprised. No problem though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Self abstain. Thanks Socky, but I agree with Jack here - it's something I rattled through in a conservation week that I think is decent, but nothing special. I never even considered it for VFH, TBH. I'm pleased you like it, but I can't vote for. On the other hand, I can't vote against my own article, so here I sit. --UU - natter 21:39, May 11 Well, we'll see how things work out... —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Abstain. It's a good article, but not feature worthy IMO. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:11, May 12 Abstain. per the author self-abstain. The aritcle isn't bad, but its not quite feature worthy. Mnb'z 17:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Per all the above. —Sir Guildensternenstein 14:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Consensus - is very good idea but execution not there yet for a vfh. --Romartus 10:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH