Talk:VFH

Discussion
Archives

• Archive I
• Archive II

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the VFH article. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that. For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

Featurization

I notice all the time on VFH things that get 5 or 6 votes TOTAL get almost immediately featured, while we have things with upwards of 10 votes sitting there not even on the queue to be featured. Why? Of course I know that a contributing cause can be overworked and underappreciated admins. Maybe you need another one... ;) Robertodole 05:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Show me the nomination page of an article that got 5 or 6 votes and got featured, and maybe I'll listen to you. If you really want to know how many votes recent features got, see here. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I swear that I only read A Man Getting Hit in the Crotch 800 Times because it was featured... I swear I had seen it (things with <10 votes getting featured) in the past too, but was too lazy to comment until now, and I figured the archive would keep such information, but of course, it doesnt, since that makes too much sense. Does anyone else remember A Man Getting Hit in the Crotch 800 Times being featured? Or am I just crazy? Robertodole 02:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

IP

It's still half a vote for IP addresses, isn't it? There's no instruction to that effect anywhere on the page. Sir Roger 06:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Ooops. That's true....good catch. Unfortunately, you're going to have to yell at an admin to get it done.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Those rules are shown when you first nominate an article. I suppose that doesn't do much good for that rule. I'll add a link to the rules somewhere. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:26, 06 Aug 2007

I know I've had to re-count the votes when IPs vote, and update the vote-count accordingly. They keep giving themselves full votes. Dumb buggers.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   04:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)  

PLS

Are PLS winners eligible for a VFH nomination? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes. And they're encouraged.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Top 3 - July

I'm unclear as to why the top 5 are listed for July when there was no tie for third - there was a tie for second, but that still gives you three articles without having to add more. Sir Roger 02:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Because Mhaille told me to. Eh?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Fix'd. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 07:44, 20 Aug 2007

Actually, how about we do it this way? I go into the history and do the Top 3 from when the vote was supposed to close? Then there's no tie.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

How about you go back to an alternate history where the dinosaurs don't go extinct? That'd be cool. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

No way, we'd all squished or eaten! Haven't you seen Jurassic Park? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:37, Aug 20, 2007

You're no fun. They'd get all the fat people first. Then they'd get all tired and have to take a nap. Then we put saddles on 'em. Dino-cowboy, wooo! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

I can see it now: riding off into the sunset on my dinosaur, eating the fat people as I go....Ah, the simple life....P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:05, Aug 20, 2007

Suggestion to Replace the Darwin Rule

There is currently a discussion in place on whether or not to keep the Darwin Rule or replace it with one of three challengers here. Please read the discussion before voting. -Tritefantastic 16:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Low votes....again

I noticed that VFH votes seem to be rather low lately. FA-quality pages aren't getting featured, or are doing so really really slowly. After conservation week, can we put up a template that tells people to vote for VFH, like we had a while back? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:46, Sep 3, 2007

Perhaps if we can get that marginally less annoying sitenotice-above-the-tabs they have at wikipedia now, we could put a message in there about VFH voting. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:26, 03 Sep 2007

It'd be nice. My HP is low. --THINKER 06:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Try a hyper potion, they restore 200 points of HP. Oh, and a sitenotice would be great, Spang. Anything that gets people to get over to VFH and read pages and vote for stuff. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 07:19, Sep 4, 2007

Giga Bowser

Lulz. Apparently I closed this VFH failure. I'm going to guess that the script looks at the last editor of a page, and that I edited it after Ljlego failed it, but before he locked it? Just looks odd as funk. I likey.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   04:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)  

Yeah, I was confused about that, then remember it does just show the last editor, and assumes nobody edited it after it closed. Too much trouble to fix it though! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 10:07, 05 Sep 2007

I like it though. I have the POWAR!!!!     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   00:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)  

Can I re-nom Macau?

Can I re-nom Macau? I have done alot of work on it since it was rejected so is it possible to re-nom? --Moneke 12:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, just as long as it got pee'd. Remember when you're typing in the nom, to type in Macua (2nd nomination)--Sir Manforman 13:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Whole Votering

Score: 1.25

Can an admin please add a blurb in the instruction box about registered users only being allowed to vote in whole numbers (ie. no .5 votes)? Only IPs are .5s, unless policy has changed without my knowledge. --THINKER 18:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

1. Weak for. Lol. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
2. Weak for. Burp. MrN  Fork you! 20:35, Dec 5
3. Half-for. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:31, Dec 5

Uncyclopedia:VFH/rules. If I missed anything, let me know. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 22:31, 05 Dec 2007

Yes, there's some mustard on your lip. No, other side...up. There. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Thanks Splangy! :) --THINKER 05:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Christmas feature

I assumed Donner was going to be our Christmas feature this year, but it's on the main page today. Can we re-feature it on the 25th, or is there something special planned that I don't know about? -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, we have a holiday related article that's going to featured on the 25th--Æ 15:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Bloody Christians with their bloody holidays ~ Mordillo where is my CAPTAIN CRUNCH? 15:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I was hoping it was going to be Shot your fuck up but sadly no one nominated it.... :( -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

I was trying to get HowTo:Mail a Letter out on Boxing day, since it's all about mailing a thank-you letter to some bitch who got you socks, but that's not going to happen, methinks... Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 19:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)