From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 7
|
| Nominated by:
|
ScottPat (talk) 17:04, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
For: 8
|
 Nom and forClever use of writing in the style of the topic. ScottPat (talk) 17:04, April 3, 2013 (UTC)- For. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:26, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
- For. It's brilliant, in the parts I've read, so I know all the caps and parts that irritate me, when I read them, they're more likely to be brilliant than not, so I'm ready to vote "For" on this. Will read more of it later. Aleister 1:02 6-4-'13
- For. Works for me. Funny, clever, subversive, brilliant! Great article. GoldFishRock
 contribs talk Saturday, 27 April 2024 16:27 12:10, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
- For. It's clever. Cleverness should be rewarded. It's also a good concept that's been pretty well developed. --Dr. Duff (talk) 03:30, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Funnybony
   07:50, Apr 14
- For. Cute and clever! Spıke Ѧ 10:49 14-Apr-13
- For. Very original. Reverend P. Pennyfeather (talk) 19:39, April 14, 2013 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
 Against. Reluctantly though. This has a fair amount of potential, but I'd avoid the BENSON reference (as too in-jokey), and remove the references to all individuals (GWB, Mitt Romney, Darth, etc.) I'd say it's a 30% rewrite away from a feature - it's just making sure the 30% goes the right way. • Puppy's talk page • 11:30 12 Apr 2013
|
| Comments:
|
- Comment. i get the concept and this has potential but it lacks any formatting beyond caps or no caps and the concept could be a little more developed/planned out. and expanded a little IMHO ShabiDOO 06:22, April 6, 2013 (UTC)
- You tricked me. Since the page was so irritating towards the top and I started down deep in the article and was greatly impressed, I missed the George Bush quote and even a further reference to George Bush. So I can read no further. As Hugo Chavez said when he stood at the U.N. podium the day after George Bush stood there, "El Diablo was here. Right here. I can still smell the sulphur." But you got my vote before I saw that you have the devil on your page. Cat o'nine tails. Now I know it must be polished to perfection, as Shabidoo implies, and if you could get him to do a pee review of the page then two of our best writers will be communicating to each other. The potential ScottPat has is very good, and ScottPat, you should learn one thing alone followed by one other thing: As Funnybony said to me once, "Uncyclopedia is a playground for adults". And when you write here you should be banned if you don't follow Rule number three. Aleister 22:54 7-4-'13
- I have only placed one George Bush quote in here. There is no further reference to George Bush. I'm not quite sure what problem you have with references to George anyway. Sir ScottPat
  UnS CUN VFH (talk) 06:07, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
- References to George W Bush date the article (even more if it is George Bush Sr), and are in general overused in other articles. We are looking for originality, as well as humor and prose. We want articles that will still seem current or at least relevant next year, unless they are an UnNews (which are typically about current events). George W Bush is old meme, if you know what I mean. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 22:20, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
- If there is too much advocacy for your fellow lefties Aleister and Simsie, then there is way too much for me, though I didn't notice it. I did notice that the Infobox is wide and garish. Spıke Ѧ 10:49 14-Apr-13
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:49, April 26, 2013 (UTC)