Uncyclopedia:VFH/What a Wikipedia Article Looks Like for Those With ADHD

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

HowTo:Read a Wikipedia Article With ADHD (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 2 Hyperactive, Perverted Teenagers
Nominated by:	Flipwits
For: 8	Self-Nom & For: I put this up for Pee Review and people seem to like it... So I thought, what the hell, I'll try for a feature. If anything, you can't say it isn't original...--Flipwits For Good satire of teenagers, reminds me of J.D. Salinger. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:53, Aug 16, 2007 For -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 16:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC) For, I like it man. Can't help thinking it would be funnier if the mention to ADHD in the title was removed though. I sometimes think like that and I don't even have ADHD... -- Hindleyite Converse 19:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC) For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC) For, or something. I seriously expected this article to be awful, but it's hilarious because it's true. For me, at least. Although I don't think it's reading a Wikipedia article with ADHD... it's more like reading a Wikipedia article at five in the morning. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 01:03 Aug 20, 2007 For Me likes.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC) For because... heh heh, "for," like in golf... I've played golf... --YeOldeLuke 00:58, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Against: 6	Against - Sorry, but I don't think this should be featured. For the same reason I hate the AAAAAA! article. SRXT. 16/08 07.05pm Ugh The ADHD thing has been done into the ground. Not to mention the title sucks. -RAHB 04:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Against as per RAHB -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Against. I found it quite hard to read, and while I get the idea, didn't actually find it that funny. Sorry. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC) Eh     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      01:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Against similar to the William Shatner page, which annoyed the hell out of me - also as per SRXT, RAHB et al. --BobbyBobson 07:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)BobbyBobson
Comments:	I helped out with the formatting a bit. Feel free to revert some of it if you don't like it. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:53, Aug 16, 2007 I can't really make a catchier title without explaining he has ADHD right from the start of the article, so it wouldn't be in the title... And he doesn't mention the ADHD until his long rant at the end, because, why would he? As for running it into the ground, that's your opinion, but it's still less hyperactive and incoherent than the original ADHD article someone else wrote... --Flipwits How about HowTo:Read a Wikipedia article with ADHD? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Meh, then it would have to be more step-by-step, wouldn't it? I couldn't really keep the whole "inner monolouge while reading" thing... --Flipwits No, he has ADHD, it's not really important to have steps. I like TKF's title. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:22, Aug 17, 2007 Well, if it's a vote-determining issue, I guess I could change it... --Flipwits Abs. eh.. not really compelling, but well done. --THINKER 06:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH