Uncyclopedia:VFH/How To:Write An Article That Stands No Chance Of Featuring On Uncyclopedia

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

How To:Write An Article That Stands No Chance Of Featuring On Uncyclopedia (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 13 Inertia fueled writers
Nominated by:	— Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
For: 20	Nom and For - great stuff— Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC) For. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:44, Aug 11 for the irony if nothing else Also FU edit conflicts -- ambiguous Ape (murder) (Riot Porn) 20:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC) For. - "OHHH, GROSS!" Step 1: Gross-Out Reader. Step 2: Explain To Reader Why Gross-Out Was Necessary. Step 3: Pray That Gross-Out Did Not Induce Sudden Blindness. Step 4: Hope For Vote!--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 22:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC) For. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC) For. Very nice. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 23:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC) These good people have pursuaded me to vote in the affirmative. For following the herd! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC) F♥r. sirsysrq @ 17:31 Aug 12 Shitfucks, it seems I've gone against my very own policy of "it's funny, so vote for it if it's funny, not if it's an injoke". Which is a rather long name for a policy, I know. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 19:19 Aug 12, 2008 For I read, I laugh, I vote. MrN  Fork you! 01:23, Aug 13 Weak for Per Hex, but more leaning to For. It could probably be made a bit better really, but it's the best take on this idea I've seen so far. -RAHB 01:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC) weak for. clever enough. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:16, 14 August 2008 (UTC) Door. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC) For. Made me laugh. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:18, Aug 18 For.. Tickled my funnyboner -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 19:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC) For - Funny. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC) For. Funny enough to balance out the in-jokeyness. –—Hv (talk) 30/08 13:24 For. Ironically, my most recent three articles conform to some or all of these guidelines.Yes, in-joke, but well-explained and witty, likely to actually draw newbies into the Uncycl fold rather than baffle them. (IMHO, other opinions are certainly valid.) ----OEJ 14:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC) For? Not bad, enough to get a vote.--Greyweasel 12:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Against: 7	Against Injoke. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Against. I just... not only was it an injoke, but hasn't this been done 18 times before??   Le Cejak • <2:10, 12 Aug 2008> In jokel --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Against - Yeah, I can't help but feel not only that this is very obvious, but also that I have seen it many times before. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC) ...actually you've seen it twice, once from me and once from LJ. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Against. In-joke. Seriously. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:26 Aug 12, 2008 Against. I really don't like self-referential stuff being on the front page. pillow talk 23:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC) IN JOKE INTERNAL ERROR 90210 Sire Methamphetamine SMOKE METH! 15:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Against I can has injoke --Moneke 07:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments:	Abstain It's nothing new, but it's a fairly good take on it... Mr. Lavrenti "Digits" Hex 1:14 Self referential and injokey stuff works when it's subtle like here Schindler's Listcruft... lets just say if this was like that then someone would be getting a blowjob tonight --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article