Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnPoetia:Why, oh why, Mister Cat!

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnPoetia:Why, oh why, Mister Cat! (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 6.5 cat lovers
Nominated by:	Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 16:09, 27 April, 2011 (UTC) 16:09, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
For: 16	The best Poem I have ever read... Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 16:09, 27 April, 2011 (UTC) For. And I'm not even voting for this just to be difficult like usual. I laughed. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 16:18 Apr 27, 2011 That's actually pretty normal. 1234 ~ 16:23, 27 April 2011 For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:27, 27 April 2011 For. Can't vote against cat neutering. (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2011 17:05, April 27, 2011 (UTC) For In honor of the cat I wrote this about long ago. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:11, April 27, 2011 (UTC) For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:55, April 27, 2011 (UTC) For. T.S. Elliot. And people that have hung out around cats would get it, and they'd laugh at the feature. Maybe fix the caption link, though, unless it's part of the yoke.Aleister 1:38 28-4-'11 For. Georgeous --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 02:09, April 28, 2011 (UTC) I had a laugh. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:15, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Strong For Per Aleister. I've always had cats, and I totally get this. Also, little Mikey (a one-year-old tabby) votes "For" as well--he can't stand seeing poor little kitties get neutered. See? he agrees; he's eating my shoelaces. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 04:02 April 30, 2011 (UTC) For~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 04:02, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Weak for. After thinking about this long and hard, I've decided I sort of like this. -- 05:41, April 30, 2011 (UTC) For. Beats a mile-long article with zero laughs any day. Ed Refugee 14:44, April 30, 2011 (UTC) My cat approves So do I, for that matter. --Username18 KUN FP 02:40, May 6, 2011 (UTC) My attention span approves. --Black Flamingo 16:09, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 9.5	Against. It's, like, thirty words long, and good for exactly one laugh. Sorry. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:42, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Against. Are you kidding me? It doesn't even make a rhyme and it's sooo small. ~  18:18, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Against. Not exactly T.S.Eliot... RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:50, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Against. However how beautifully written and funny the poem is, I believe this is far too short to be featured. Mattsnow 01:57, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Against. No. 137.159.94.172 00:12, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Against. What the hell is this -- Frosty dah snowguy 22:20, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Against. per above. Mn-z 05:46, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Against It's not as good as something that's better. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:05, May 1, 2011 (UTC) Against. WTF?  TALK  FRESH MEAT  ♥ talk to me 21:48 8 May 2011 21:48, May 8, 2011 (UTC) Against. It reminds me a lot of the song "Kitty" by The Presidents of the United States of America. And I hated that song. pillow talk 21:17, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments:	Comment. Guildy: you do have a point; everything you said in your vote is totally accurate. But do consider the limitations of the namespace it was created in. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 17:46 Apr 27, 2011 inb4 ‎UnPoetia:Epic Poem is mentioned. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:53, April 27, 2011 (UTC) I don't really buy the whole 'limitations' argument, as evidenced by this massive fucking thing I wrote in the very namespace in question. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:32, April 28, 2011 (UTC) Comment II: Comment harder. Poetry doesn't need to be long, and certainly doesn't need to rhyme. I'll shut up now. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 19:23 Apr 27, 2011 Hence the "roses are red" poem on UnPoetia's front page! Which I find to be hilarious, by the way. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 04:10 April 30, 2011 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH